Blogs from our ‘family lawyer attorney MN’ Category

SPECIAL NEEDS, MEDICAID, AND PAYING FOR HOUSING

Tuesday, April 16th, 2013

SPECIAL NEEDS, MEDICAID,

AND

THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHERE YOU LIVE

 

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has issued a potentially landmark decision in Pashby v. Delia,  upholding the rights of disabled North Carolina residents to choose where they want to
live.  An article can be found  in Healthlaw.org HERE.

The plaintiffs in the suit were challenging North Carolina’s refusal to pay for personal care attendant services through Medicaid unless such services were provided in an adult care home.  The plaintiffs claimed that the State’s policy unfairly shuffled them into institutional care settings rather than permitting them to remain in their own homes, a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  The State had claimed that an Adult Care Home was not an institution, but the Court rejected this claim.  The Court also rejected the State’s claim that budgetary constraints were a legitimate reason to require such services to be provided only in an institutional setting, such as an adult care home.  The Court stated that, “Although we understand that the North Carolina legislature must make difficult decisions in an imperfect fiscal climate, the public interest in this case lies with safeguarding public health rather than with assuaging North Carolina’s budgetary woes.”  The Court’s decision can be found HERE.

Jennifer Moore

www.MooreFamilyLawMN.com

 

MACMH (Minnesota Association for Children’s Mental Health) ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 28 – 30

Wednesday, March 20th, 2013

MACMH (Minnesota Association for
Children’s Mental Health)

ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 28 – 30, 2013

 

The
Minnesota Association for Children’s Mental Health (MACMH) is holding its annual mental health conference in Duluth, MN on April 28-30, 2013.  We have attended this conference many times and have always been struck by the expertise of its presenters, the variety of attendees and the dedication to helping children, especially special needs / handicapped children.

The conference is useful for anyone with involvement with special needs or handicapped children – teachers, other educators, social workers, other 2professionals and parents and family. You will find here workshops that are helpful no matter where you are from, not just Minnesota.

You can find out more about MACMH and register for the conference HERE.

Thomas Moore

Office Manager

www.MooreFamilyLawMN.com

SPECIAL NEEDS FAMILIES NEED SPECIAL FAMILY LAWYERS

Tuesday, February 19th, 2013

SPECIAL NEEDS FAMILIES NEED SPECIAL FAMILY LAWYERS

TWO SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN IN MINNESOTA

Many years ago, my brother (who had two special needs children in Minnesota) and his wife divorced.  As part of their divorce, they had to work closely together in order to resolve issues related to the ongoing medical needs of their, the allocation of waivered services provided under TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) that paid for the personal care attendants (pca’s), housing modifications needed for the children, and therapies not covered by medical insurance.  Parenting was complicated by the fact that pca services were provided in only one home, and as the children’s condition worsened, it became difficult to transport the children for parenting time.  Once the children qualified for social security benefits, my brother and his former wife needed to determine who would be the children’s representative payee.   Both of them had to coordinate their efforts in able to ensure that the children had appropriate Individualized Education Plans through their schools.  Additionally, they had to work with educators, social workers and care providers to ensure that the children’s care plans were appropriate and that benefits would continue uninterrupted.

SCHOOLS AND DHS FEES

At one point, the school district (in Minnesota) decided that it could not provide curbside busing service to my oldest niece, who was blind and in a wheelchair.   My brother and his ex-wife needed to work together to ensure that busing was reinstated so that she could get to school.  The effort required them to file a complaint with the Minnesota Department of Education, and it was not resolved until the school district was forced to mediate.

At another time, the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) miscalculated the parental fee my brother owed to the government, because the children received TEFRA benefits, at the same time the fee was quadrupled.  With the help of an attorney, he was able to resolve almost all of the issues with respect to the miscalculation.

DIVORCED FAMILIES WITH HANDICAPPED CHILDREN

Not only do special needs parents who are divorcing have to figure out custody and parenting time, child support, spousal maintenance, and an equitable division of property and debt, they also have to figure out how to allocate the services needed by their children.  They have to figure out how to meet the extraordinary financial needs of their children.  And, if they disagree about their children’s needs, they have to figure out a way to mediate those differences so that the children are not harmed by the conflict between their parents.  Your experience outside Minnesota will of course involve different agencies, but the issues will remain.

Jennifer Moore

www.MooreFamilyLawMN.com

KATIE HOLMES, TOM CRUISE AND DIVORCE

Thursday, July 19th, 2012

KATIE HOLMES, TOM CRUISE AND DIVORCE: 

DO QUICK SETTLEMENTS MAKE HAPPY POST-DIVORCE FAMILIES?

WHAT MAKES A DIVORCE “EASY?”

What does it take to make a divorce and its attendant issues including spousal maintenance, child support, and child custody and Parenting time and property division “easy” when compared with some that are not “easy?”

 Even where a divorce is “easy” from the point of view of the lawyers, it isn’t easy to the family. But, if you settle your case quickly, there is no doubt that you will have more time to focus on the bigger issues of family transition.

It cannot be disputed that the Cruise/Holmes divorce was settled quickly.  But they had some huge advantages over other divorcing couples.

DIVORCE PLANNING BY PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT

First, they started planning for a divorce before the marriage in the form of a pre-nuptial agreement that resolved issues relating to property and support.  Most of us don’t have prenuptial agreements, but this was Tom Cruise’s third marriage and there was a large age difference between Tom and Katie.   From an estate planning perspective, the pre-nuptial agreement was essential, but if you are on your third marriage, you probably also want to engage in some divorce planning, as well.

DIVORCE, TIMING AND CHILD CUSTODY

As a corollary to planning, timing also played a huge role in making it possible for their settlement negotiations to conclude quickly.  Katie waited until Tom left for an extended film shoot to stake her claim for independence.  Tom wasn’t faced with imminent denial of
parenting rights (although it is likely that he felt he was deprived of some parenting access in the early days), and this meant that parenting issues could be resolved without allegations of parental kidnapping or alienation, despite the fact that custody issues clearly played a big part in Katie’s decision to leave the marriage.

DIVORCE AND WEALTH MANAGEMENT 

Next, it cannot be disputed that Tom and Katie’s divorce negotiations were shaped by their relative wealth and economic status.  Sometimes, money makes things more difficult, but in this case, both parties had sufficient access to the resources necessary to establish themselves in a new household that functioned independently from the marital home.

DIVORCE, ALIMONY, CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT AND SKILLED ATTORNEYS

Perhaps most important, Katie and Tom had good lawyers and good legal advisors.  It has been reported that Katie Holmes’ father, a feared divorce attorney, played an important role in shaping her legal strategy. In the early days, it looked like it could be ugly, as Katie made a claim for sole legal and sole physical custody, and the media machine kept the case (and the question of the legitimacy of Mr. Cruise’s religious beliefs) in the news.  However, even though this strategy is what is important, what made it work were the behind-the-scenes negotiations that also occurred.

DIVORCE AND THE ADVANTAGES OF PRIVACY

We won’t know what those negotiations entailed, because the final piece of this puzzle is that both parties were willing to keep the details of the negotiations and the settlement private.  Privacy is a commodity that the rest of us don’t always value in the same way.  However, Tom Cruise has consistently understood that his income is directly tied to his “brand”.  An ugly divorce could have tarnished his “brand,” probably more than it would have hurt Katie’s earning potential.

CRITERIA FOR A “GOOD” DIVORCE

In summary, good planning, good timing, equal access to sufficient resources, good legal advice and discretion made this divorce end
quickly.   For more information, please see  http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/07/10/experts-katie-holmes-media-strategy-plus-prenup-probably-behind-tomkat-quickie/

Jennifer Moore

www.moorefamilylawMN.com

FAMILY LAW AND FACEBOOK, LINKEDIN, TWITTER SOCIAL MEDIA

Thursday, June 7th, 2012

FAMILY LAW AND FACEBOOK, LINKEDIN, TWITTER,

AND OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA

 I work for a small family law firm (one attorney)  in Minnesota.  When we take on a case we are careful to warn our client about the dangers of posting to ANY social networks: Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, MySpace and even business networks such as Linkedin.  We are careful to discuss with the client the dangers of interacting with other parties about their case but especially doing so online and with the opposing party.  Like a bullet out of a gun, you can’t call it back.  Once anything gets on the web, chances are it is there forever and  someone can find it.  Be careful out there!.

Below are some recent articles on the topic, aimed at other attorneys but revealing nevertheless.  I don’t necessarily agree with everything in them, of course, but I do think them worth reading if you are involved in a divorce, child custody matter, alimony dispute, child support
issue or anything else involving family law.

How Lawyers Authenticate Incriminating Social Media Evidence

This from blogger John Patzakis dealing mostly with criminal law but with excellent examples of what NOT to do: social media evidence.

Family Law Attorney Jennifer Moore commented, “In the criminal context, courts are much more concerned about issues of authenticity. In the family court, courts will be much more likely to admit social media evidence over an objection that owner of the social media account was hacked or that someone else with access to the account typed a post.”

How Family Law Attorneys Use Social Media

This from Dishon and Block divorce attorneys. This article deals mainly with divorce and other family law matters: How Lawyers Use Social Media.

Moore stated that “although requesting access to social media has not become common practice in discovery, that is only because at this point, there really is no need. Parties in family law cases already have access to the other party’s social media sites, through friends, family and anonymous friending’. Once the other party knows you have access to their social media, the chance the social media will create new evidence is lost. So, until people treat social media with more care, it will probably not become standard procedure to request formal access to the accounts through discovery.”

Thank you for your attention and thanks especially to our sources.

Thomas Moore

Office Manager

www.MooreFamilyLawMN.com

 

er_112873311

STATES SEEK TO REGULATE ALIMONY IN DIVORCE

Thursday, February 9th, 2012

STATES SEEKING TO CHANGE ALIMONY AWARDS

In Minnesota, I should say, the family law courts operate with no alimony guidelines, no alimony cap and are very conservative in awarding alimony. However, some states are seeking to regulate and even cap the amount of alimony (also known as spousal support) awarded in a divorce.

This is the topic of the article Alimony Arithmetic by L.J. Jackson  in the February 2012 issue of ABA Journal    It makes for interesting reading.

 Thomas Moore

Office Manager

www.MooreFamilyLawMN.com