Blogs from our ‘Social Safety Net’ Category

SPECIAL NEEDS, MEDICAID, AND PAYING FOR HOUSING

Tuesday, April 16th, 2013

SPECIAL NEEDS, MEDICAID,

AND

THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHERE YOU LIVE

 

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has issued a potentially landmark decision in Pashby v. Delia,  upholding the rights of disabled North Carolina residents to choose where they want to
live.  An article can be found  in Healthlaw.org HERE.

The plaintiffs in the suit were challenging North Carolina’s refusal to pay for personal care attendant services through Medicaid unless such services were provided in an adult care home.  The plaintiffs claimed that the State’s policy unfairly shuffled them into institutional care settings rather than permitting them to remain in their own homes, a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  The State had claimed that an Adult Care Home was not an institution, but the Court rejected this claim.  The Court also rejected the State’s claim that budgetary constraints were a legitimate reason to require such services to be provided only in an institutional setting, such as an adult care home.  The Court stated that, “Although we understand that the North Carolina legislature must make difficult decisions in an imperfect fiscal climate, the public interest in this case lies with safeguarding public health rather than with assuaging North Carolina’s budgetary woes.”  The Court’s decision can be found HERE.

Jennifer Moore

www.MooreFamilyLawMN.com

 

Federal Safety Net Raided for Child Support

Thursday, March 1st, 2012

FEDERAL SAFETY NET INVADED TO PAY STATES FOR NON-PAYMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT

http://www.startribune.com/nation/140485333.html

 A new federal rule provides that states may seize every dollar of federal benefits for child support debtors, including social security, disability and veteran’s benefits, resulting in the complete impoverishment of thousands of people (primarily men) who owe back child support.  Previously, states were only permitted to garnish 65% of government benefits checks.

 While the payment of child support is a vital part of our social economy, most of this support will not go to the children or even the custodial parent on whose behalf support was owed.  Instead, the payments will go to the states to reimburse public benefits expended on the children, back when the child support obligor was indigent, incarcerated or disabled and could not afford to pay child support.

 Ironically, the end result of this new rule is that the impoverished parent will become the responsibility of their now-adult children.

Jennifer Moore

www.moorefamilylawmn.com