Posts Tagged ‘Child Custody’

DIVORCE, FAMILY LAW AND YOUR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILD

Saturday, March 24th, 2012

DIVORCE, FAMILY LAW, AND YOUR SPECIAL NEEDS  CHILD

 

I’ve often posted about divorce, handicapped children, and the issues of chld support and custody that can arise.  But, with a special needs adult child of my own it’s a topic near my heart, especially as service as office manager for a family law attorney that welcomes divorce, child custody, alimony and other family law matters involvling special needs children.

While I am not a lawyer, not qualified to judge the strictly legal parts of the article below, I can recommend the discussion of the topic  here: Divorce Considerations and the Special Needs Child:

Tom Moore

Office Manager

www.moorefamilylawmn.com

 

Divorce and Moving Children from Minnesota

Monday, January 16th, 2012

 

DIVORCE AND MOVING CHILDREN FROM MINNESOTA

 We are finding an increasing number of clients come to us with questions about moving their children.

 FAMILY LAW IN MINNESOTA

Minnesotalaw requires you to obtain permission of the Court before moving out of State with your children if there is an existing child custody order.  This permission is granted when a parent can prove that a move will be in the best interests of the children. Increasingly, our clients have found it difficult to obtain this permission—especially when the other parent has been involved in the children’s lives. 

That does not mean that it is impossible to obtain this permission.  The difference between a successful request to move is often in the amount of preparation you do.  You should have a job and a home.  You should know where your children will go to school.   If you have family in the new area, you should be prepared to explain why it is important for your children to develop a relationship with this family.   You should be able to explain the problems of remaining inMinnesota, and the effect that staying here will have on your children.   Finally, you should have a plan that allows your children to maintain a good relationship with their other parent.  

FAMILY LAW LITIGATION IN MN

Litigation is the last resort in most of these cases.  Your first order of business will be to attempt to convince the other parent that the children need to move with you.   You may have a mediation clause in your present custody order which mandates an attempt to mediate, but even if you don’t have a mediation clause, you may very well want to try that before looking to the Courts.  In almost every case, mediation of an issue like this, if it results in a settlement, will be less expensive than litigation.  Studies show that people who resolve disputes through mediation are happier with the result, even if they could have gotten a better result through litigation.  And our experience shows that Courts have some reluctance to permitting a move, even where a parent can show benefit to the children.  

If you are on the receiving end of a request to move your children, you will need to explain why it’s not in the best interests of your children to move.  You will want to focus on their life inMinnesotaand what your children will lose out on if they move.  You will be slightly favored in Court, since the other parent will have the burden of proof of showing why it’s in your children’s best interests to move, but that doesn’t mean that you should simply assume that there is no case.  Consider what might happen if, for example, your children’s other parent can’t find work inMinnesota.  Perhaps your children would be better served if their other parent had better support from family in the new location.  Finally, consider that your children’s other parent may simply not have a choice whether to stay in Minnesota or move, and your children may be moving from their home no matter what (even if it is into your home).  

But what if the other parent moves the children without my permission? 

In this event, you have remedies, most of the time. Minnesotacustody orders are enforced in every other state pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody and Jurisdiction Act.   Under that Act, you can obtain an Order which gives you the ability to ask law enforcement to assist you in securing your children’s return.   There may be additional criminal consequences for removing the children, especially if you are not told where you can find your children.  

MOVING CHILDREN TO A FOREIGN COUNTRY DURING A DIVORCE

If the children are removed from the country, you may have rights pursuant to the Hague Convention, an international agreement that permits you to enforce aUnited Statescustody order in another country.  Unfortunately, not every country is a signatory to the Hague Convention.  In those countries, you will be required to seek redress through the foreign country’s courts, and many times, those courts are unwilling to assistU.S.citizens. 

For those cases where a parent may want to remove a child to a non-Hague Convention nation, it is necessary to prevent the travel before it occurs.   One way is to limit the ability of a parent to travel with the children within the terms of a custody order or divorce decree.   Another is to keep your children’s passport with you, or to withhold your permission for the other parent to obtain a passport for your children.  Finally, you may enroll in the State Department’s Children’s Passport Issuance Alert Program (http://travel.state.gov/abduction/prevention/passportissuance/passportissuance_554.html), a program which will alert you if anyone applies for a passport on behalf of your children. 

Jennifer Moore

www.MooreFamilyLawMN.com

PIT BULL LAWYERS AND GHENGHIS KHAN ATTORNEYS IN THE MINNESOTA COURTS

Tuesday, July 12th, 2011

Pit Bull Lawyers and – Not! In Minnesota Courts

This blog is drawn from an article by Hon. Jay Quam, a District Court judge in Hennepin County, MN, published in the Minnesota Bench & Bar April 7, 2011.   You can find judge Quam’s article here:

Adversarial Advocacy in the Legal Field:  Too Much Adversity Can Hurt You

I have often cited judge Jay Quam in this blog.  He’s well worth reading!  In his article, he draws attention to “Genghis Khan” attorneys, those usually referred to as “pit bull lawyers.”  He argues that “By staying above the fray, you will put yourself in a position to win your case.”  He’s talking about attorneys but I think his words apply to legal clients too.

To summarize:  I personally found Judge Quam’s article helpful in summarizing the major problems with the ‘pit bull / junkyard dog / Genghis Khan’ lawyer or client

They take unsupportable positions that require time and effort to sort through.  They exaggerate facts and the law.  They omit telling important parts of the case.   They hide the fact that actually, they may be pretty good guys when not in attorney mode.  They create a fog of confusion that has to be cleared.

Tom Moore

Office Manager

Moore Family Law

These Are the People in Your Neighborhood – MN Family Lawyers

Friday, March 27th, 2009

MN Family Attorneys On Child Custody

 

Child Custody and the People You Will Meet

When you are facing a tough custody battle, either as part of a divorce or not, there are many professionals who may be assigned, appointed, or hired to help you and the other parent figure out what is in the best interest for your children.  The following is a brief overview of some of the professionals who may be involved.  Every case is distinct, and there are many factors that go into whether a particular professional may or even can be involved in your case. 

 

Guardian ad Litem

If the court is concerned about the children based on some allegations of abuse or some other serious factor, it may order a Guardian ad Litem be appointed.  A Guardian ad Litem is someone who works for the county government and is trained to interview, observe, communicate, and make recommendations about the best interest of the children in a case.  They are the ones who speak for the children, and have a lot of influence in how the case will be viewed by the court. 

 

Custody Evaluator

There are many professionals that may be hired as a custody evaluator to help the parties and the court determine the best custody arrangement for the children.  These are often private practice attorneys or psychologists with an expertise in this field.  However, Hennepin County Family Court offers an Early Neutral Evaluation program that is a free service ordered early on in a case to help the parties attempt to work out their differences in a setting similar to a full evaluation.  If parties do not come to an agreement at the end of this process, however, the next step may be to hire a private Custody Evaluator. 

 

Parenting Time Expeditor

The court may order a parenting time expeditor be appointed to help the parties with their parenting time plan or unforeseen circumstances not addressed by earlier agreement.  An expeditor is empowered by the court to make decisions on behalf of the court.  The cost of the expeditor is paid for by the parties. 

 

Parenting Time Consultant

The parties themselves outside of the court may make an agreement to hire a parenting time consultant (although this agreement can be memorialized in a settlement agreement put on the record with the court).  A consultant does not have the legal authority of an expeditor, but is generally given more free rein to deal with the broader scope of situations that may arise in parenting and custody disputes.

 

Emily M. Matson, Esq.

Moore Family Law, P.A.

www.moorefamilylawMN.com

3350 Annapolis Lane North, Suite C

Plymouth

Phone:  763-951-7330

emily.matson@moorefamilylawmn.com

JOINT CUSTODY AND PARENTING TIME IN A DIVORCE

Saturday, March 14th, 2009

VISITATION AND PARENTING TIME 


Today we no longer call a father’s time with his children “visitation”.  We call it “parenting time”. 

 

A VERY BRIEF HISTORY OF JOINT CUSTODY

James Cook died on February 21, 2009 at the age of 85.  He is considered to be the founding father of joint custody laws in the United States.  In the 1970′s, Cook was going through a bitter divorce.  He asked for joint custody of his son, but was denied because the law favored giving custody of the children to the mother.  He ultimately lost his battle for custody, but lobbied extensively for the joint custody laws that we enjoy today.  http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-james-cook12-2009mar12,0,1547708.story

 

HOW MINNESOTA FAMILY COURTS TEND TO VIEW JOINT CUSTODY

There is still a strong presumption that the mother is the primary caretaker of young children.  This is not codified in anywhere in the law, but is certainly present in the results of disputed custody cases.  Consider that in disputed custody cases, both parents will typically present themselves as being primary caretakers of the children.  In such cases, Courts routinely rely on the impressions of custody evaluators or guardians ad litem to provide investigative feedback as to which parent served as primary caretaker (along with other factors which may not be as gender-skewed).  Then, if the case does not resolve itself after a custody evaluation, the Court (at least in Minnesota), will accept the custody evaluation as evidence in the case, and will take testimony to determine who is, in fact, the primary caretaker of the children.  Any bias by any professional involved in the case may result in a result that is gender-biased against the father–even though the law is gender neutral.

 

WHAT EXPERIENCE TEACHES US ABOUT CHILD CUSTODY

In my experience, these biases are best resolved by carefully establishing through testimony and documentary evidence that my client performs all or many of all the tasks associated with being a primary caretaker.  It is especially helpful if this evidence is objective.  For example, if my client took the children to every doctor and dentist visit, the care provider notes will indicate it.  If my client attended all student conferences, there will be a record of it.  If my client signs off on all the children’s homework, there is evidence.  If my client does all the transportation to and from daycare or extracurricular activities, there may be no documentary evidence of it, but there is probably some testimonial evidence of it. 

 

I would not risk my client’s relationship with his children based on the ideal of the unbiased judiciary.

 

Jennifer Moore
Moore Family Law, P.A.
3350 Annapolis Lane North, Suite C
Plymouth,  MN 55447
(763) 951-7330
jennifer.moore@moorefamilylawMN.com